Don't lock-step follow 'accepted practice internationally'. Don't conflate high infectivity with a high death rate. If New Zealand is blind to the facts, we sentence Kiwi owned farms to death.
We can be circumspect about agencies that claim legitimacy based on some offshore reckoning, and that fail to be fully transparent about the scientific processes.
We've always understood that actors will use technology in their interests. The best way to make a lot of money very quickly is to dovetail with government policy. It's very easy for governments that don't pay scientists to do the basic research to then pretend that they are following the science - but when these claims are investigated they are outdated and/or groundless. We can be circumspect.
In this article I hoped to draw attention in a practical way to the tangible possibility that actors with COI's can work to nefariously create a set of circumstances for a false flag event to a real event that is, for example, driven by GoF and that results in some form of chimeric pathogen. This can then create the rational for emergency powers. What I try to emphasise is that if the basic research is not being transparently done and published - we should have low trust in institutions with the powers that seem to derive from some sort of delegated authority or facts where they harmonise with offshore actors.
As many know, the inventor of the PCR test Kerry Mullis 'if you do it well you can find anything'. Mullis emphasised that PCR tests enable authorities to take a miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and talk about it in meaningful - like it is important. That is not a misuse, that's a misinterpretation'... 'It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you.'[1]
We can see that MPI are saying that all of a sudden avian influenza went from low pathogenic to high pathogenic yet failing to think about stress and nutrient status. We know that in humans, flu season peaks in mid-winter when vitamin D is at its lowest for example, then infections move quickly through families and communities because our immune systems are vulnerable. We don't say that flu has gone from low pathogen to high pathogen.
Having scientists with the freedom to assess feed quality, work with farmers, without MPI looking over their shoulders, but with MPI respecting the scientific process is critical.
This is where Antoine Béchamp's (1816–1908) terrain theory makes sound sense - if a plant or animal subjected to is nutrient deficiencies, toxic stress, heat stress, and so on, this will set the stage for cascading biological processes that include inflammatory, epigenetic and microbial/bacterial and disease onslaught, lower productivity/fertility etc - because the body doesn't have the defence mechanisms. [2]
I consider that stressors primarily drive disease/low productivity and that governments have hypocritically pretended to be authorities on health and disease management, while ignoring, underfunding and failing to scientifically and practically understand and address environmentally mediated stress (primarily the role of toxicity and nutrition and the biological circumstances necessary for efficient nutrient uptake).
Are you aware of Christine Massey's "germ" FOI Newsletter regarding lack of proof of alleged viruses?
These two posts are relevant:-
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada confesses re bird flu hoax: we have zero evidence of a virus or contagion
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/agriculture-and-agri-food-canada
Scottish Government confesses to having no scientific evidence of any bird flu virus
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/scottish-government-confesses-to
We can be circumspect about agencies that claim legitimacy based on some offshore reckoning, and that fail to be fully transparent about the scientific processes.
We've always understood that actors will use technology in their interests. The best way to make a lot of money very quickly is to dovetail with government policy. It's very easy for governments that don't pay scientists to do the basic research to then pretend that they are following the science - but when these claims are investigated they are outdated and/or groundless. We can be circumspect.
In this article I hoped to draw attention in a practical way to the tangible possibility that actors with COI's can work to nefariously create a set of circumstances for a false flag event to a real event that is, for example, driven by GoF and that results in some form of chimeric pathogen. This can then create the rational for emergency powers. What I try to emphasise is that if the basic research is not being transparently done and published - we should have low trust in institutions with the powers that seem to derive from some sort of delegated authority or facts where they harmonise with offshore actors.
As many know, the inventor of the PCR test Kerry Mullis 'if you do it well you can find anything'. Mullis emphasised that PCR tests enable authorities to take a miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and talk about it in meaningful - like it is important. That is not a misuse, that's a misinterpretation'... 'It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with was going to hurt you.'[1]
We can see that MPI are saying that all of a sudden avian influenza went from low pathogenic to high pathogenic yet failing to think about stress and nutrient status. We know that in humans, flu season peaks in mid-winter when vitamin D is at its lowest for example, then infections move quickly through families and communities because our immune systems are vulnerable. We don't say that flu has gone from low pathogen to high pathogen.
Having scientists with the freedom to assess feed quality, work with farmers, without MPI looking over their shoulders, but with MPI respecting the scientific process is critical.
This is where Antoine Béchamp's (1816–1908) terrain theory makes sound sense - if a plant or animal subjected to is nutrient deficiencies, toxic stress, heat stress, and so on, this will set the stage for cascading biological processes that include inflammatory, epigenetic and microbial/bacterial and disease onslaught, lower productivity/fertility etc - because the body doesn't have the defence mechanisms. [2]
I consider that stressors primarily drive disease/low productivity and that governments have hypocritically pretended to be authorities on health and disease management, while ignoring, underfunding and failing to scientifically and practically understand and address environmentally mediated stress (primarily the role of toxicity and nutrition and the biological circumstances necessary for efficient nutrient uptake).
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmZft4fXhQQ
[2] https://www.terraintheory.net/blogs/articles/the-germ-is-nothing-the-terrain-is-everything
Thank you for covering this.