3 Comments

“…as it was always understood that coronaviruses mutate rapidly. This fact had made them unsuitable for vaccine development in the past.”

In retrospect, I should have been much more sceptical of the entire SARS-COV-2 narrative from early on—especially with regard to risk profiles—but the tsunami of fear-inducing, alarmist information from overseas made it difficult to avoid being manipulated. But the quote from you above really does resonate because even based on my very limited knowledge and research at the time, I was highly suspicious of claims that an effective vaccine could be rapidly developed and rolled out. One only needs to look at the history of human coronaviruses and past efforts to develop vaccines to realise that these claims were highly suspect. Then there is the issue of messenger-RNA technology and why this was so heavily pushed as the only viable strategy to protect the population. After that we were transported “through the looking glass” into a world of mass psychological warfare.

Expand full comment
author

The media messaging was repetitive and insistent. It had all the symbolism, the power, the props, to incite and sustain fear and inhibit critical thinking. It was only later in 2020 when I realised how much information contradicted their early 2020 messaging.

Expand full comment

I love how substack is censoring my profile photo, my name and my voice.

The censored photo makes people wonder “WTF is that?” which, apparently, is not allowed. So they just don’t let you see it.

Freedom.

Expand full comment